skygaming

When the Lakers announced that Bronny James would be heading to the G-League, not many batted an eye. However, the team revealing that he’d only play in the South Bay Lakers’ home games and wouldn’t travel with the squad to away matches raised eyebrows. Allegedly, the franchise doesn’t want the young guard to fly commercial, which is how their G-League team travels. Rapper Chuck D was perplexed about the reports and highlighted the absurdity by revealing how Michael Jordan traveled during his time in Minor League Baseball. The Bulls icon tried his hand at baseball after retiring from the NBA in 1993 and played for the Birmingham Barons, the Chicago White Sox’s AA team. Jordan, who was at the peak of his fame, did not demand preferential treatment. Instead, he adapted to the ways of his teammates even at the expense of his comfort. Chuck D recalled on X, Jordan not only traveled with the team but also forked out $350,000 to purchase a bigger bus so the entire team could travel together to their away games. The retired guard didn’t have to go out of his way to look out for his teammates but did because it was the right thing to do. When the greatest and perhaps the most famous player of all time had no issues adapting to the modest lifestyle of players in development leagues, Bronny, a rookie, who wasn’t all that impressive in high school or college, getting preferential treatment rubbed fans the wrong way. Fans lash out at Lakers’ decision to not let Bronny play away games in G-League Chuck D wasn’t the only one astonished by the reported reason why the Lakers aren’t letting Bronny travel with the South Bay Lakers to away games. Fans on social media also called the franchise for hindering the guard’s development. One fan wrote the decision is a disservice to the rookie, who has to ‘ prove himself.’ Another fan claimed they admired LeBron James’ dedication to ensure his family gets the best of everything, but added that the Bronny situation ‘feels so wrong.’ The Lakers have repeatedly claimed they believe in the young guard’s potential and expect him to develop into an everyday player for the team. However, their handling of his development has raised questions about the validity of their claims.The Associated Press article “Hamas, Fatah near a deal on who will oversee postwar Gaza” (Dec. 4, 2024) presents a post-war Gaza that assures another Hamas attack. First, Hamas and Fatah are active terrorist organizations that can’t be considered “politically independent technocrats.” Hamas is a U.S. designated terrorist entity. While Fatah is put forward as the moderating force, that is ludicrous in light of its “pay-to-slay” program – a several hundred million dollar budget item to pay terrorists who kill Jews and to support terrorists’ families. Second, a Hamas/Fatah government would perpetuate the same leaders who plotted and executed the Oct. 7, 2023 atrocities. A Hamas/Fatah government also gives Hamas and Fatah control of all the global resources necessary to stabilize and redevelop Gaza. Since 1948 the world has spent billions of dollars in Gaza. That investment funded construction of an imposing network of terror tunnels and grew the crop of Hamas fighters and Gazan civilians who slaughtered 1200 Israelis and foreigners on Oct. 7. The world, including Gazans themselves, deserve a professional, truly independent government committed to Gaza’s citizens and to peace, not to the same corruption and depravity. Elaine Albom Braffman, Esq. Woodbridgeskygaming 。

COLORADO 73, NO. 2 UCONN 72Musk causes uproar by backing German far-right party ahead of key elections

Swiss National Bank Cuts Stock Position in Ciena Co. (NYSE:CIEN)None

BELLARMINE 80, BOWLING GREEN 68NoneN.J. town disbands police chaplain program after imam’s comments spark controversy

None

Musk causes uproar by backing German far-right party ahead of key electionsHYBE’s BigHit Music Promotes Seon Jeong Shin to PresidentChase Artopoeus has two TD passes, TD run as Chattanooga tops Austin Peay 24-17 in season finale

None

NoneFederal appeals court upholds law requiring sale or ban of TikTok in the US